Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Living With Food: The Science Supporting Eating Disorder Treatment

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The Impact of Messages Surrounding Obesity on Eating Disorder Treatment

Posted by Mark Warren on Fri, Apr 16, 2010 @ 12:36 PM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 
By Dr. Lucene Wisniewski and Dr. Mark Warren
 
Recently, there has been tremendous attention being paid to obesity throughout our culture. From Michelle Obama, to the recent articles in The Plain Dealer, to medical experts, to television shows, we are hearing with great frequency about obesity. This focus on obesity can create unique problems for individuals who suffer from eating disorders.  
 
One of the challenges of working in the field of eating disorders is the reality that for most people in America the primary concern is losing weight, not gaining weight or stopping restriction and over-exercise. For our clients who may be having life threatening weight-loss behaviors, the focus on obesity in our culture may be confusing at a minimum and at its worst may present a risk to their well being.
 
We believe that messages around obesity may be potentially detrimental to our clients for several reasons:
 
  1. The culture implicitly suggests that weight loss in and of itself is a good thing regardless of why and how it is done.
  2. The method of losing weight, which may involve behaviors which are highly disordered (e.g. severe caloric restriction, and/or intense and compulsive exercise) is rarely questioned since the focus is on weight itself and not how it is lost.
  3. Messages regarding obesity and weight loss are often delivered by well meaning and sometimes uninformed individuals who fail to understand the impact of their words on the person who is hearing them.
If one is obese it is not helpful to be told “you should lose weight”. This is just about as useful as telling someone with anorexia, “you should gain weight”. What we are in need of is better information on how to talk to people about food and body issues, how to help people focus on health rather than on size and how to counter the overwhelming negative messages that exist in our culture about our bodies. Most importantly, is the need to know how to help everyone, wherever they happen to be on the weight spectrum, to know how to take care of their bodies and to value themselves as a a unique individual, based on the things that are truly important. 
 
Contributions by Sarah Emerman and Julie Norman 

Medication and the Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa

Posted by Mark Warren on Fri, Jan 22, 2010 @ 10:39 AM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Medication may be part of successful treatment for bulimia nervosa. In multiple studies, treatment with antidepressants has been shown to be moderately effective in reducing the binge/purge cycle of an individual with bulimia nervosa. Trials have shown that antidepressants are superior to placebos in diminishing overeating, decreasing self-induced vomiting, and increasing the sense of control that someone has over their eating. Other studies show the response for those with bulimia to be similar to the rate of response with depression. Since it takes approximately two weeks to observe changes in depression with medication, it is implied that within two weeks some benefit may be seen in those with bulimia as well. Large scale evaluation of the studies of bulimia suggest that high doses of fluoxetine, generally within the range of 60 mg a day, has been optimum for reduction of behaviors and improvement of sense of control. In general, the rate of response to antidepressant medications, in particular fluoxetine, has been shown to be approximately 50%. To date, no consistent predictors of response have been identified. That is, a level of depression prior to treatment does not predict how well these will work with bulimia, even though they may be indicated for depression.

 

In no situation should medication be used alone for bulimia. Studies demonstrating the effectiveness of medication are clear that all medications are secondary to primary treatment with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Dialectical Behavioral Therapy. As noted above, fluoxetine, a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor "SSRI", has been studied more often than other medications. Studies by Walsh et al. suggest that taking an SSRI while undergoing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy can result in a significant reduction of symptoms of bulimia (Walsh, Wilson, Loeb, Devlin, Pike, Roose, Fleiss, & Waternaux, 1997). Studies also tend to show that by three weeks of treatment with an SSRI at an appropriate dosage, patients who will respond to medication have already started to show a response. Therefore, the benefits of SSRI treatment should be quickly experienced.


Of some concern with medication and bulimia is the potential seizure inducing risk of Wellbutrin. Because both bulimia and Wellbutrin have been associated with seizures, in general the use of Wellburtin in patients who have bulimia presents significant risk. It is not fully clear whether this risk is theoretical or has been experienced by a significant number of patients with bulimia, as studies of this question are not available. Given the theoretical risk, we try to avoid this combination whenever possible. There is also a small literature on the use of stimulants in patients with bulimia. These remain case reports and we await more thorough studies on this question. Again, given the potential seizure risk of stimulants, they should be used with caution.

 

A side note needs to be made concerning Topamax, which has been suggested by some clinicians as being an effective treatment for bulimia. To date, studies have not shown Topamax to be superior to an SSRI. Topamax may be associated with paresthesia (tingling) and cognitive impairment. Although Topamax has been reported to have effects on weight, the literature does not support using Topamx for weight issues with bulimia. 

 

Walsh, B. T., Wilson, G. T., Loeb, K. L., Devlin, M. J., Pike, K. M., Roose, S. P., Fleiss, J., &

     Waternaux, C. (1997). Medication and psychotherapy in the treatment of bulimia nervosa. 

     The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154:4, 523 - 531. 

 

 

Next week: What does it mean to be in recovery?

 

 

Contributions by Sarah Emerman 

Medication and the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa

Posted by Mark Warren on Fri, Jan 15, 2010 @ 10:37 AM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Pharmacotherapy (the use of medication) is in general only minimally helpful for patients with anorexia nervosa. There are no studies demonstrating that any medication leads to recovery from anorexia. Many medications have been tried, including Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (Prozac, Zoloft, Celexa, Lexapro) lithium, marijuana, Clonidine, Reglan, Propulsid, and Naltrexone, but none have been shown to be effective. The atypical antipsychotic medications (Zyprexa, Seroquel, Risperdol, Abilify) have been utilized in several trials for anorexia. They have not been shown to result in recovery.

 

Although not successful in producing recovery, medications may be indicated as part of a broader treatment program for anorexia. In this context a broader treatment plan means that the level of care is an intensive outpatient or a day treatment program with the presence of a multidisciplinary team including a dietitian, psychiatrist, primary care physician, and therapist. A multidisciplinary treatment team must be involved any time medication is utilized since it should only be used as an adjunct to treatment.

 

Within this context, two groups of medication are sometimes helpful.

 

  1. Benzodiazepines, which are primarily used to target anxiety. Anxiety disorders may be comorbid with anorexia as high as 50% of the time, and the process of refeeding often increases anxiety as well. In these situations as part of the overall treatment plan, benzodiazepines (Ativan, Xanax, Kolonopin) may be useful. These medications are potentially addictive and may cause physiological dependence. Therefore, although they have the potential to be helpful, one must be cautious when taking these medications.
  2. The atypical antipsychotics have also been shown to have value for some patients with anorexia. These can be helpful for patients whose eating disorder has aspects of obsessive compulsive disorder or delusional thinking. They may also be prescribed for clients whose anxiety or agitation around food issues may be so profound that they must be utilized for the client to have the ability to engage in other treatment. There are concerns about these medications causing weight gain due to overeating in some patients. To date this has not been shown to be the usual experience of patients with anorexia. We do not use these medications to facilitate weight gain.

 

Of special note: the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are often ineffective when someone is at a low body weight. At a low body weight a person has diminished protein synthesis, diminished neurotransmitters, and therefore diminished ability to benefit from these medications. One may also see increased toxicity at a low weight, including gastrointestinal side effects. There is some evidence, however, that SSRIs may help prevent relapse once weight is restored.

 

For more information on medications used in the treatment of eating disorders visit: http://www.something-fishy.org/doctors/medications.php 

 

 

Next week: Medication and the Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa

 

 

 

Contributions by Sarah Emerman 

 

How do we determine level of care for eating disorder treatment?

Posted by Mark Warren on Fri, Dec 11, 2009 @ 09:46 AM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

 

According to the standards of the American Psychiatric Association there are five separate levels of care for eating disorder treatment. In terms of increasing intensity, these levels of care include: outpatient, intensive outpatient, full day treatment/partial hospitalization, residential treatment and inpatient hospitalization. An evaluation for appropriate level of care is the most important initial step in eating disorder treatment. Without receiving treatment at an appropriate level of care, the chances of successful treatment are significantly reduced.

 

It is critically important when beginning treatment or meeting with a provider for the first time that the assessment includes data to decide what the appropriate level of care is. This data should include: medical status, sucidiality, body weight as a percent of healthy body weight, motivation to recover, comorbid disorders, structure needed for treatment, ability to control impulsive behaviors, lethality/dangerousness of behaviors, environmental stressors, and geographic availability.


 

Outpatient care is generally indicated for a medically stable patient without suicidality, whose percent of ideal body weight is generally greater than 85%, with fair to good motivation. The client must be self-sufficient in their need for structure, able to manage their behaviors, and have an adequate support system.

 

Intensive outpatient programs are indicated when percent of ideal body weight is higher than 80%, and there is fair motivation. This level of care is appropriate when the client needs some meal support and when mild external structure will produce significant behavioral change.

 

Day treatment/partial hospitalization is indicated for patients when percent of ideal body weight is higher than 80%, with lower motivation, who may be preoccupied with intrusive thoughts and needs significantly higher external structure. This level of care provides a much greater level of meal support and structure to patients.

 

Residential care is generally indicated when a patient needs supervision for all meals, whose percent of ideal body weight is less than 85%, and requires a fulltime structured environment to reduce behaviors and increase medical stability.

 

Inpatient hospitalization is generally indicated for patients requiring medial stabilization, who may be experiencing low motivation and may have an existing psychiatric disorder that requires hospitalization and full time supervision. When medical stability is as risk all other criteria must take a backseat until stability is achieved. Once medically stable, other treatment decisions can be made.

 

 

Many people searching for eating disorder treatment are naturally unclear as to what level of care they initially need. This is particularly true when deciding between day treatment and residential programs, as they have similar criteria for admission and are both quite life interrupting. There are a number of excellent residential programs with whom we work and refer to. In general, day treatment should be attempted prior to residential treatment. There are a number of reasons for this including: the preference for a least restrictive environment, the ability to work with partial motivation at both levels of care, presence of increased structure at both levels of care, and the ability to stay at home while in treatment. Additionally, the importance of generalizing skills learned in treatment to ones home life is a critical issue for all patients with eating disorders. When residential is indicated, it often must be followed by a day treatment program to practice using acquired skills in a real life setting. 

 

 

Next week: What is compulsive exercise?  

 

 

Contributions by Sarah Emerman 

 

Therapy Fails Patients, Patients Don’t Fail Therapy

Posted by Mark Warren on Fri, Oct 23, 2009 @ 10:14 AM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

One of the great tragedies of the mental health system is its labeling of those who have not responded to care as "treatment failures." The truth is the therapy may have failed, but the patient does not. This is obvious in all other areas of health care. When someone has cancer and is given chemotherapy that does not work we do not say they have "failed chemotherapy." Rather, we understand that the chemotherapy was wrong for this patient and their type/progression of cancer. This is also true with eating disorders. If you are not getting better, the problem is not that you are failing therapy; it is that the therapy is wrong for you. This is a central tenant of DBT that “therapy fails patients, patients do not fail therapy”.

One of the complications with treating eating disorders is that the illness itself causes distortions and difficulties with accepting the need for treatment. Effective therapy for eating disorders involves finding the motivation for change and working with your treatment team to make change happen. If you are in therapy for an eating disorder and have not yet found the reasons and motivations you need to get healthy, then it is unlikely that you will get better. Effective therapy therefore begins with developing the motivation to change, the commitment to doing the extraordinarily hard work ahead, and the orientation to what effective care will be for you. For treatment to be successful, these pieces must be in place.

 

Next week: The relationship between motivation and commitment and eating disorder therapy

 

Contributions by Sarah Emerman 


Insurance Coverage for the Treatment of Eating Disorders

Posted by Sarah Emerman on Thu, Oct 15, 2009 @ 09:00 AM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Please take a look at this timely news article on the dilemma of current medical coverage for the treatment of eating disorders. The article features commentary from Stephanie Sizemore of the Eating Disorder Advocates of Ohio and our very own Dr. Mark Warren.  

Ohio Eating Disorder Advocacy Groups Working for Better Insurance 

By Maureen Kyle
Oct 15, 2009
WKYC.com 


What Is The Length Of Eating Disorder Therapy?

Posted by Mark Warren on Fri, Oct 09, 2009 @ 11:54 AM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Given the complexity of the brain, and the reality of everyday life, all of us are prone to some psychological issues. All psychiatric disorders may therefore have long term implications.

Anytime a person has had any psychological issue, whether it be anxiety, depression, panic, substance abuse, or an eating disorder, they’re always at greater risk for the return or relapse of this disorder. Recovery involves many things. Treatment must then be seen as having multiple phases.

For eating disorders these phases include:

·    Medical stabilization - Insuring that the cardiac, brain, bones, endocrine (i.e.: the return of menses) and other systems are intact.

·    Refeeding - Gaining an appropriate amount of weight, usually 95% of pre-morbid weight to prevent relapse.

·    Behavioral control - Stopping or reducing binging, restriction, purging, over-exercise, and pill usage.

·    Feeling better about oneself - Increasing self-esteem, better body image, general increased levels of happiness and the ability to experience multiple different emotions.

·    Changing the way a person thinks about food, body size, and shape

·    Having the life a person truly wants to have

One will see a therapist or be in a formal program for a significant amount of time, often measured in years. A person will also need caring and connection for the rest of their lives. Formal eating disorder treatment is likely to last one to five years given the complexity of the multiple stages of healing. All of the above happens in the context of building a supportive, knowledgeable, community that one will be able to experience for the rest of their lives. Each phase of treatment takes a variable amount of time, but no one who has ever suffered from an eating disorder should ever be without their community of care and support. In this way, although significant advances towards recovery may happen in as little as one year, healing should be seen as life-long.

Getting into recovery from an eating disorder is an extraordinary and rewarding experience. From the perspective of evidence-based therapies, particularly DBT, recovery is a path a person follows, not an end to be achieved. As an eating disorder gets better, a person gets to appreciate and enjoy their lives more and more. They come to fully inhabit their lives. For people with and without eating disorders, the process of achieving and continuing to be the person we most want to be is a joy we work towards forever. 

 

Next week: How do we determine goal weight?

 

Contributions by Sarah Emerman 

Why Don’t All Therapists Use Effective Eating Disorder Treatment?

Posted by Mark Warren on Fri, Oct 02, 2009 @ 12:50 PM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

It’s difficult to do effective eating disorder treatment. There are multiple reasons for this including:

  1. Issues surrounding training
  2. Cost
  3. Insurance, and
  4. The newness of evidence-based treatment for eating disorders

Training for doing eating disorder treatment: 

Typically, specialized training is not part of the usual curriculum for virtually any mental health provider. In order to do evidence-based treatment, usually one must get training outside of standard professional education. Where to get training and how to find experts to train with may be complicated. If you are a mental health provider and you did your training more than 10 years ago, you probably wouldn’t be exposed to these ideas or techniques even if you aggressively sought them out.

Cost of eating disorder treatment:

Financial issues also exist. It is more expensive to treat eating disorders than many other psychiatric disorders since they involve complicated multi-specialty teams. These teams likely include dietitians, primary care physicians, specialist physicians, and the need for multiple weekly visits, lab work, and other medical treatments and evaluations. Practitioners must be prepared to develop a team and work in teams to adequately address the various aspects of treatment.

Insurance and eating disorder treatment:

Insurance coverage may also be a limitation to obtaining effective treatment. Most insurance plans limit the amount of coverage they provide for patients with eating disorders. Although this is true for psychiatric disorders in general, coverage for eating disorder treatment is even more limited than other diagnoses. This is the case in many states, including Ohio. True effective eating disorder treatment is neither fast nor easy. It takes a complicated multi-disciplinary treatment team working together over a prolonged period of time to reverse a behavioral disorder that may have been present for years. In general, insurance is looking to shorten the course of treatment to make it less expensive. To be effective, eating disorder therapists must resist the pressures placed on them by insurance companies.

Newness of eating disorder treatment:

Another significant issue is that many effective eating disorder treatments are quite new. Treatment now is vastly different than it was 10 years ago. In order to provide effective care, therapists must stay current and be able to do ongoing training. For a therapist, eating disorder treatment is challenging. Patients have life threatening illnesses, the eating disorder itself is resistant to change, medical complications are common, the social support for having eating disorders often isn’t strong, and frustration for a therapist is quite common. Without a supportive team and effective care, a therapist may burn out.

 

Next week: What is the length of eating disorder treatment?

 

Contributions by Sarah Emerman 

 

    All Posts